Considering it one to be relationary, it implies to give importance to it because you are important, since you are agent in the opinions and social manifestations and politics if supporting in them in speak above of the cited author. The masculine, responsible culture for vetoing what it happens of the woman, it contributes of certain form so that feminine literature did not rest and it was not found insignificant. The conception of that it only had a literature, had as masculine, served for the man as a repressor mechanism of feminine literature. The woman has much time writes and questions the originated irregularities of a patriarcal system. In the attempt of if eternalizing as synonymous author and of being able and social control, the man if nominates rule. In this direction literature loses a little its essence and the identity of a people. Wedge (2001, p.22), regarding the subject masculine literature verses feminine literature discourses saying: ' ' In the enclosure for bullfighting of the quarrels and the controversies, as many nervous and irritated times, avulta the question of the survival or the falling of trees of the literary rule, that before serves of beacon and measurer to authorize the admission of the workmanship in the sky of elect or its banishment of that world of the Deuses.' ' The process of canonization in literature seems is associated with the effective culture, by means of the optics of the author above cited. In this aspect alone he was attended the man this condition, since the power centered in its hands, exhausting its literature and limiting the word of feminine authorship, that therefore beed situated to the edge of everything (culture, society, politics). In with poetical license one expects that it has a change in the vision that if has of the woman in the society. Society this that still conserves the hegemony of the man.
Many believe that metal can not ignite. Steel and iron can not burn, it's true, but the bearing metal as a result of prolonged exposure to a temperature of 500 C soon lose their strength, and possible collapse of buildings and loss of life. To prevent a possible tragedy holds fire protection of metal in order to ensure the safety of iron or steel in terms of combustion from 30 minutes to 2 hours, which with more than enough to lift people out of a burning building and extinguish the fire. Fire protection of metal represents a drawing of him with a special compound which, when used correctly appearance actually does not differ from paints. The function of these compositions – to ensure insulation bearing structures, or simply withdraw from them warm. For insulation of metal is best suited thick-retardants incombustible composition (plaster, plastering, etc.), in addition apply sheet materials, prefabricated elements, masonry. These actions will help to increase the fire resistance of iron structures at 120-180 min.
The deposition of thin thermally refractory mixes – also the type of fire protection of metal (which swells when heated). From the usual paint compositions of this type are not easy to distinguish. This substance during combustion is expanded to forty times, due to release in the goreniyanetoksichnyh process gases forming loose coke-and foam structure. Thermal conductivity of the charred layer of foam, which consists mainly of carbon, low. Fire protection of metal – not a simple process. At first steel covered with corrosion protection agents, in choosing which attention should be paid to the degree of adhesion (adhesion to the metal), because the compositions of this type are not very fire resistant, so fire-resistant layer can simply crumble in the ignition without saving metalwork. The best choice of corrosion-resistant materials will be specifically designed for "fire-retardant paint. Flame retardant applied to the layers (to 10). At the same time to avoid cracking of the refractory coating layers must be thin.
What it would be Really? Far from trying to base one, only the proposal presented here would be a reflection concerning the subject and some presented nuances being of illustrative form. Since remote times that if the famous truth searchs, we can cite the Philosophy of Old Greece, going of the daily pay-socrticos until our society contemporary, thinking, for example, in a Claude-Lvi Strauss. Passing for diverse theories that deny or look for to validate the call truth, being that the proper negation is an affirmation of the negation and the affirmation a negation of the refusal, also with all a systematization to look for to take care of the two opposing proposals. We can in sending to the misticismo and the search to them for an inconceivable, absolute truth and undisputed, what a Metaphysical construction would regimentaria all, but also it can imagine Parmnides and all an empirical experimentation that converges to the truth to what it is, being that this ' ' ' ' if it relates what exists and we can contemplate, although exactly the Metaphysical can use an argument on the abstraction to exist in the abstract field, being able even though to arrive in the truth that is reached by the cognitivo method of an individual. Clearly that the materialists could urrar, therefore they would atrelariam the true what is concrete and consequently subjecting the abstract to a previous experience, a quarrel that can last without becoming fertile, in view of not the resolution and the propagation of speculative and mere fugidias conjecturas to a systematization. Here we adentramos the scientific truth, that one that is from the moment that I can systemize and prove, beyond as ' cites Weber in its workmanship; ' Science and Politics: Two Vocaes' ' , to foresee, or to foresee, not being associated to no prophecy, but yes to a logical set of probabilities.
Leaving of the definitions of the learning and memory concepts, the relation between the two will be analyzed, and where measured one it conditions and it influences the other. Still special relevance to the process of the memory in the retention will be given to know during the learning. 1 Framing Theoretician the memory human being is a basic element in the tasks of verbal understanding and writing, in the calculation and reasoning. It represents an indispensable paper in the cognitivo system and could be considered responsible by some important differences to the level of the performance of the citizens in the pertaining to school, professional tasks, day to day, in the execution and performance of the tasks to carry through. The memory consists of a set of procedures that the individual allows to manipulate and to understand the world, having in account the individual context and experiences. These procedures involve mechanisms of codification, retention and recovery. It is known that the memory human being possesss limitations, that is, the individual is only capable to memorize an limited number of information.
The memory is one of the components that integrant part of the cognitivos processes is. For Sternberg (2000) Cognitiva Psychology deals with the way as the people perceive, learn, remember and think on the information. The psychologists cognitivos study the biological bases of the cognition, the mental images, the attention, the conscience, the perceo, the memory, the language, the resolution of problems, the creativity, the taking of decisions, the reasoning, the cognitivas changes during the development throughout the life, intelligence human being, artificial intelligence and several other aspetos of the human thought. For one better centfica understanding of the memory human being has been adopted different perspetivas. The perspetivas most frequent can assign for structural perspetiva and the procedural perspetiva. Perspetiva according to structural, the memory would be constituted by some responsible systems for the storage and retention of the information wants short-term wants in the long run.