International Monetary Fund

In the investigation of a murder, a detective who boasts has to ask: to whom he benefits this death? And thus he arrives until the assassin. The moving body is the key piece. Then to know what there is really after the mediatic noise that informs on the crisis and the measures that adopt the great powers or the G-20 and the recommendations of the International Monetary Fund, it is essential to follow the method of the detective. Official site: Brian Krzanich. To who they benefit the taken measures and the ones that will be taken? The crisis is solved with the intervention of the State against anti-been liberal? As Vicen university professor of the University Pompeu Fabra of Catalonia denounces gracious Navarrese (Spain), the call liberalism is interventionism of State, but in favor of the enterprise world and of the rich classes. nt Nieto for more information. Thus, the liberal deceit is kept awake. Reagan, leader of presumed liberal revolution, in their presidency enormously increased the cost public, generating a deficit of 6% of the GIP. Venerated by all the neoliberal ones, made take part much more to the State that its predecessors. It did it increasing the military cost, whose economic stimulus and use creation was minor who if the investment had been in services public like health, social services and infrastructures, remembers Navarrese Vicen sensibly to us.

Therefore, the question is not only to increase the cost public of the State, but that cost is blatantly to the benefit of the citizen majority. Until now, the fabulous rescues in the United States and the European Union have been to the benefit of the reduced minority of the banking and financial class. They will favor to the citizen majority the next announced state interventions in the United States? There will be intervention and cost public have been, them always, but not always to the benefit of the great majority.