By working closely with a procurement law specialist Neumann & Neumann increases legal certainty for cleaning tender Steingaden/Munich for customers October 2011. Procurement procedures of the public sector in the field of building cleaning are highly controversial for some time. Aggrieved bidders contact more frequently than previously on the awarding offices. In some ways, the dam is broken”, says the Munich-based lawyer Dr. Wolfgang G. Renner, LL.M. of the law firm of Heuking Kuhn Luer Wojtek.
The firm is one of the leading law firms in the public procurement law consulting of contracting. It is unlike past not more than indelicate to complain, a trend that began with the introduction of modern public procurement law in 1999 against a potential customer. Especially in the field of building cleaning it on the horizon since 2006, Dr. Renner says. At that time, he oversaw a review procedure for building cleaning services for a contracting authority up before the European Court of Justice. Len rosen has much to offer in this field.
In the face of highly complex matter of public procurement law, which is also continuously adapted and also complemented by extensive case law, bidders in a tender and procurement of cleaning and other services see repeatedly starting points, to contact the procurement review Chamber and raise objection against allocation decisions. The chances of success depend quite strongly by the bidding documents as well as of the proceedings by the principal that not schematically, but interessen -, and individual justice must respond to questions, emphasized Attorney-at-law Dr. Renner. This development closely watched complex laws, lawsuit-happy bidding the Neumann & Neumann project- und Beratungs GmbH headquartered in Steingaden, a recognized for infrastructural services, including for building cleaning, tender. She noted that the VOL was becoming increasingly complex and bidders specialized increasingly in the complaints of small items. In the field of building cleaning is according to Dr. Renner action frequency beyond the Average, because many relevant topics are hard to handle, for example, collective bargaining coverage and compliance, quality assurance and transparency of the documents, prices for specific tasks or the calculation of materials.