To learn is a creative discovery, in the certainty that change is possible for both the sexos, and that this learning comes with the opening of risk and the adventure of the being, therefore teaching if it learns and learning if it teaches. that the autonomy, the dignity and the identity of educating has that to be respected, therefore in case that contrary if this being will not be respected will be something empty and inoperative (FREIRE, 1996). Elon Musk has plenty of information regarding this issue. The film has a chapter where it deals with the family of Neil of an adolescent who has a dream of being artist, while its parents want that it carries through the dream of the mother who was to have a son doctor. This attitude of the family makes with that the young one if feels pressured and overwhelming, where arrives a point where the same it does not support more and suicidal with the gun of the father. Keating professor, makes with that the adolescent reflects in what likes, in the accomplishment it its desire, and not what it is tax. For Freire the hope and the optimism are gigantic possibilities in the change possibility, where the educator to consider one practical educative one in the resolution of the problem (1996). The school is worried in teaching, and not in making the pupil to learn to think, being a model conservative where he possesss its basic principles: tradition, honor, discipline and excellency. This orthodox and secondary vision, harms the professor in such a way therefore, it does not pass of the mesmice as the pupil who lives in a neutral vision, and without understanding of its certainty and truths. Freire (1996) affirms that ' ' education without research does not exist and nor research without ensino' ' (p.32). To teach, to learn and to search deal with the knowledge production, where the questioning of the truths and certezas makes to create possibilities to intervene with the reality in order to modify it.

The present study intended to identify and to present, through the perception of professionals of Human resources of different companies, which factors can contribute positively to give sensible to its work. For the achievement of this objective, beyond the theoretical recital with specific bibliography on the subject, a questionnaire in professionals was applied who work in the area of Human resources. From the application of the questionnaire, the gotten answers had been evaluated and compared with what they had written the diverse authors cited and listed in the bibliographical references. Through the results, it was possible to say, unanimously, that the work has a direction for these people, even so with different forms of representation and importance for each one of them. that, moreover, the quality of the work environment intervenes directly with the effectiveness of the development of the activities, as well as in the particular life of develops who them. Word-key: Felt of the Work. Quality of Life.

Who already complained there of the routine? It is the great evil of century XXI. When I speak that it is the great evil, I mention to the society ' ' saudavel' ' , that it has capacity to think and to reason. This insatisfao is something that folloies since lowest in the social scale to highest and is a great poison in the society. I myself I confess that generally propaganda of my routine. Propaganda to wake up early, to have that to go to work, to have that to make a repetitive work, to catch a full bus, to go to study a super substance boat and to arrive in house late of the night to only sleep. Ufa! Thing is sufficient pra if to complain.

Also, I am a born pessimist, and an impatient one of first category, I finish for afobar itself in diverse questions. But before this seems one monosoon on my life, I want to speak that I categorize the routine in three categories: the routine me, the necessary routine and the good routine. Perhaps what I go to speak here perhaps if wall lamp what I think on these three categories, you read and speak: ' ' categories for routines? what? ' '. I go to try to explain my line of reasoning. We go the routines! 1. Routine me: Is that one that you leaves pra low, discouraged and that it seems that to each day consumes you more, takes off you a little of the things that you have pleasure. This generally it is caused by coquetel trabalho+estudos, or trabalho+ family or then trabalho+trabalho. Whichever, pra me the work is involved in this drug of routine me. She takes care with this routine, therefore it is mortal! It kills until most optimistical of the human beings. Pra this routine if has 2 remedies, the first one is: skirt of the routine.