That requirements should meet a human being to be donor? Aside from being healthy, he and his family must have a big heart, a humanist, generous, altruistic spirit, here’s a story already there were no words, throat was a tomb, a hollow without saliva, anonymous tomb of voices, just exhaled whimpers, as regurgitadas Elegies of hell, that night Valentine died standing in the grey window of lifehe contemplated impotent indifference of silence beside her prayers and prayers of family and friends, reminded him that God exists, its so sad as he tears, were confused with the humidity in Lima that night Savior in the midst of the cold and wet out of classes – that night-, traveling with his girlfriend, Valentin slept, cowardly tires patinaron, the mist and the Devil came togetherthe car struck, Salvador hit head was taken to is health, his family cried, doctors were informed that it was a brain death do that? If!, features Encephalic and trunk are irretrievably dead, it breathes and beats, but with the help of a machine but inexorably will stop his heart beating and breathing in some time, they cried and screamed was a young man of 28 years, University, scholar, doctors reported him Savior could be a SOCIAL hero if they accepted their organ donation refused Valentin cried looking in the mirroricteric, skinny, no forces, Salvador agonized Valentin died, both families were crying, begged the doctors, but the family didn’t understand then God appeared what do doctors? – asked the MOM-, Dios Mio accepted, accepted! Screaming the transplant team how are organs?-asked Dr. It’s believed that Mark Bertolini sees a great future in this idea. Chaman – Aptos, Aptos!, he repeated Dr. Laurent Potdevin will undoubtedly add to your understanding. Padilla, operating, operating! They shouted the nurses looked at the list had 12, 20, 50 hungry people’s life, call the compatible, to the more serious! and they called them, Valentin was shaking, was the third time they called him this time was for him!, operated it 12 hours, Salvador was buried in silence, without gears, touches of silence, his gesture and his family never came out in newspapers or newscasts Valentine went to the ICU to the floor came out high and today Sonrie, Salvador was a multiorgan anonymous donorGENEROUS, HEROICALLY donated liver, kidneys, corneas, skin and lungs, several people were spared this is a donation!, sublime Act of giving, altruistic, generous, free, shaped over the pain that the premature death of a loved us causes, is it difficult? clear is very difficult to say La donation if!, in those moments, requires greatness, information, transparency, organization and precisely is what is missing!. Organ donation and transplantation is victory over the selfishness of the Current society, the heroic act in which life conquers death, in the puddle of pain, is an act of solidarity and fraternity, a proof that the body dies, but never the love that sustains it, as said Juan Pablo II sudden Santo!, transplants are technically possible, socially are difficult, the State the ignored, mercantilism harasses them, by it has emerged in the business world, the trafficking of organs that has already fall into their corrupt networks to surgeons, staff members and patients, therefore requiring lucid the country’s institutions a vigorous and sustained campaign in favour of donation free and generous of organs that contareste the offset donation that is beginning to spread to the world and which will make transplants unattainable Utopia that many poor people will die dreaming. Original author and source of the article
Often we hear: "good practice". It has long been secretly feel that there is a positive experience, but never really thought about it. Yes, and it is clear when a decision leads to success, we are trying to replicate, ie, in such situations act in a certain pattern already. Why change what has already been tested and works? And almost always leads to success. Of course, we have used previously received a positive (ie, what to do), knowledge and skills to the task. What is it but a positive experience? But something was still in such a formulation of the problem is not satisfied. First, re-use scheme has already proven results in much faster and better results. A related site: Intel mentions similar findings.
Explain it using only proven methods is impossible. If you are moving the same way as before, and the results are about the same. So you do not make the mistakes committed in the first time. In other words, you move a shorter and less tortuous path due to the fact that not go in the already-known dead-ends you. But it can be completely and not the road on which you moved the first time. You choose the first available road (but with a great chance most of the way will pass on the previous one), avoiding the known and expected you to dead ends. Second, consider how you usually make decisions.
Calculates the possible consequences of certain decisions, and immediately reject the unacceptable. But the rest of you do not choose the best, and take away those who think the worst at the moment. The decision is not necessarily the most optimal. And with a similar problem this solution may be rejected because the previous result is already known, and it could be worse than others can provide the solutions. As in chess, there are notable debuts, and experienced chess players always know the correct move in each combination.