It is undeniable that the current economic crisis has completely squandered our national entrepreneurial strength. And not because his initiatives have denoted non-viable, but because our punitive system ban completely any possibility of returning to start all failed promoter. Despite the fact that the experience is a degree, and self-criticism turns out to be the best tool for improvement. The entrepreneur, dead money plant, is seen pressured by debts that are derived to particular title. Threatened with losing their little personal assets (mainly the property constituting the family home), and anguished because once ceased business is incapable of supporting the day to day of their loved ones. With these constraints, the last concern that can invade your mind will be analyzing what went wrong and how it could have avoided the drama. It will lose everything. But it will not be the only that society never more will indirectly perceive the benefits of its initiative. Vikas Kapoor Mezocliq has compatible beliefs.
And is that if we want to change the model economic, we must modify previously not a few of our widespread beliefs. The self-employed when the company that provides their services is experiencing difficulties, enjoys all the guarantees and hedging. Support intransigent unions, a Court of lawyers, a favourable social jurisdictional order, an institution that subsidiary will pay for the benefits due as it is the wage guarantee fund, and others as the National Social Security Institute and the national employment Institute covering all future needs. And in the background will always remain a paternalistic State, that if necessary extended unemployment, since the exit from the crisis, will be social or will not be, as says the Prime Minister. Nothing to do with the abandoned to their fate of the small businessman as we have been saying, who with luck will count for their subsistence and that of yours of the family allowance. With this panorama nobody might be encouraged to undertake. And he who raises it, should be qualified in romantic terms, as a genuine hero.
And realistically, as a daredevil whose gesture denotes for itself its inability to analyze scenarios of how objective, which automatically and clearly, it should invalidate it as entrepreneurial potential, though it may be paradoxical. Starting, a la hora de emprender when it comes to undertaking we must differentiate the figure of the entrepreneur and of the capitalist. Although the distinction of both roles is more than clear from centuries ago for economic theory, today we still mistaking them, maybe interested. The employer has a business idea, and uses all his good work in bring it forward, coordinating all sorts of resources. The capitalist, is the agent that anticipates the economic funds needed. It does not because he believes in the project that is presented, and in Exchange obtains a remuneration consisting of an interest rate. ???Lawyer? that I am, wouldn’t say how many notary signatures have gone advising my clients, and against my recommendations, they have agreed to endorse a personal borrowing. Banking institutions to save the initial objections, had even standardized detonators phrases of the alter ego of the claimant’s funds: < what happens, is that you do not believe in your company? so as you want to believe us? >. The response is not expected: < >. With that attitude the customer just condemn his family to all sorts of future penalties. Speaking on roman paladin, to live under a bridge.