However, the national authorities have given to understand that they will use those funds to loans to the productive sector to one year at a rate that ronde only 11%. Is that the way to protect the savings of the welfare system? Beyond criticism and any accolades received the plan, the question that matters to respond, given the goal of it is: will the new anti-crisis plan be effective? Since its announcement, many analysts have criticized the failure of the plan in terms of its magnitude, beyond of the distribution of the same. The reality indicates that the country is limited as to implement greater magnitude in size, so the key will pass by the effectiveness of the shot they are playing. And here is where again returns the item that mentioned them about the systematic denial of the Government of its responsibility for the situation of the argentina’s economy. This denial does nothing more than produce uncertainty since the Government, not to recognize errors in its management is giving to understand that probably again to commit the same mistakes or more serious by maintain your posture.

With this attitude, to maintain uncertainty in the economic context, it makes that families do not wish to consume and prefer to save to be prepared against a possible worsening of the situation. It is very difficult to think that average family argentina think at the moment in going into debt to acquire a 0 km, when the economy has slowed, unemployment rises, and the economic situation shows signs of bewilderment. Also it is difficult to think that a company (e.g. SMEs), decides to invest by lower that rate, when the perspectives on the evolution of their activity are negative (and if they were positive, the uncertainty of the expected profitability product of the fragility of the rules of the game, they make the return required to decide to invest too high). The perception There is that Government’s priority should be to strengthen the macroeconomic scenario, seeking to generate stability and transparency for thereby, giving security to the private sector, the economic stimulus plan can gain in efficiency.

In parallel, and in what seems to be an additional measure, while not declared, while the plan begins to take shape in what refers to the small print, the exchange rate of the dollar in Argentina continues to rise and now stands at $3.46. It is not something Ebay would like to discuss. The depreciation of the Argentine peso was a measure widely claimed by the Argentine industrial sector, before the deterioration observed by the real exchange rate in recent times product of the inflationary acceleration that had come to exceed 30% YOY (though in recent months were heavily desacelerara by the fall in external inflationary pressures and strong local demand retraction). In this context, the depreciation of the Argentine peso, (at least partly), protects the local tradable sector from foreign competition (increased by the crisis), although probably not to generate a significant impact in exports given depressed external demand. The weakness both internal as external demand, gives peace of mind that the depreciation observed in the exchange rate is not transferred to prices. The Argentine Government is still testing different formulas to avoid the economic decline, which has started already several months ago and not as a result of the international crisis. How long will take to recognize their mistakes and to deal with the real problems of the Argentine economy?

10 Excision purposes the main objectives of the Division are as follows: 1) the redistribution of activities of an undertaking or of several. (2) The specialization of activities, since every society will have only some activities, which may perform better or at one lower cost. (((3) Geographical decentralization, which can be divided by States, regions, departments, districts, cities, etc. 4) reduce the payment of taxes for two reasons: (4.1) as each of the resulting companies have a lower income, will be within a different regime, for example resulting from companies already they do not pay within the general regime but within the special scheme of the income tax. (4.2) To a particular area of the State corresponds to a particular tax benefit. ((5) Solutions to internal problems of the partners: (5.1) the way to lead the company. (5.2) The types of operations that society should be performed. (5.3) The selection of suppliers and/or clients.

(6) Clean up society, small of her activity or activities with economic problems and thus, determining the activities that work well, of those difficulties, avoiding the pollution of those by these. (7) Elimination of the non-legal monopolies, achieving thus appearing in this space and time, the competition, and thus that these companies gain competitive advantage. 11. The Division is a recordable Act acts are divided into recordable and not registrable, which corresponds in this seat determine if the split is a recordable Act. Recordable acts are the inscriptions or annotations that logger extends into the registration. Not recordable acts are acts which the Registrar can not extend in the registry. Excision is a recordable Act, by which registration provides registration publicity to this Act in the registry items. 12. LA excision not only was recorded at registration of societies this recordable event is also recorded in records of other legal persons such as associations, committees, foundations, peasant communities, communal enterprises, rondas campesinas, individual limited liability companies, cooperatives, among other legal persons or autonomous bodies, therefore this recordable Act is not exclusive of the registry of societies.

It is undeniable that the current economic crisis has completely squandered our national entrepreneurial strength. And not because his initiatives have denoted non-viable, but because our punitive system ban completely any possibility of returning to start all failed promoter. Despite the fact that the experience is a degree, and self-criticism turns out to be the best tool for improvement. The entrepreneur, dead money plant, is seen pressured by debts that are derived to particular title. Threatened with losing their little personal assets (mainly the property constituting the family home), and anguished because once ceased business is incapable of supporting the day to day of their loved ones. With these constraints, the last concern that can invade your mind will be analyzing what went wrong and how it could have avoided the drama. It will lose everything. But it will not be the only that society never more will indirectly perceive the benefits of its initiative.

And is that if we want to change the model economic, we must modify previously not a few of our widespread beliefs. The self-employed when the company that provides their services is experiencing difficulties, enjoys all the guarantees and hedging. Support intransigent unions, a Court of lawyers, a favourable social jurisdictional order, an institution that subsidiary will pay for the benefits due as it is the wage guarantee fund, and others as the National Social Security Institute and the national employment Institute covering all future needs. And in the background will always remain a paternalistic State, that if necessary extended unemployment, since the exit from the crisis, will be social or will not be, as says the Prime Minister. Nothing to do with the abandoned to their fate of the small businessman as we have been saying, who with luck will count for their subsistence and that of yours of the family allowance. With this panorama nobody might be encouraged to undertake. And he who raises it, should be qualified in romantic terms, as a genuine hero.

And realistically, as a daredevil whose gesture denotes for itself its inability to analyze scenarios of how objective, which automatically and clearly, it should invalidate it as entrepreneurial potential, though it may be paradoxical. Starting, a la hora de emprender when it comes to undertaking we must differentiate the figure of the entrepreneur and of the capitalist. Although the distinction of both roles is more than clear from centuries ago for economic theory, today we still mistaking them, maybe interested. The employer has a business idea, and uses all his good work in bring it forward, coordinating all sorts of resources. The capitalist, is the agent that anticipates the economic funds needed. It does not because he believes in the project that is presented, and in Exchange obtains a remuneration consisting of an interest rate. ???Lawyer? that I am, wouldn’t say how many notary signatures have gone advising my clients, and against my recommendations, they have agreed to endorse a personal borrowing. Banking institutions to save the initial objections, had even standardized detonators phrases of the alter ego of the claimant’s funds: < what happens, is that you do not believe in your company? so as you want to believe us? >. The response is not expected: < >. With that attitude the customer just condemn his family to all sorts of future penalties. Speaking on roman paladin, to live under a bridge.